7 Highlights from the Enrollment Management Staffing Survey

image of a person taking an online satisfaction

7 Highlights from the Enrollment Management Staffing Survey

Enrollment management in higher education is a critical field that shapes the future of institutions by overseeing recruitment, admissions, retention, and financial aid strategies. However, little is often known about the professionals behind the scenes—those who work tirelessly to meet enrollment goals while navigating an ever-evolving educational landscape. Our recent Enrollment Management Staffing Survey sheds light on these professionals, offering comprehensive and measurable insights into their roles, compensation, benefits, professional development opportunities, training, onboarding, job satisfaction, and demographics. The findings provide a clearer picture of the challenges and opportunities facing these professionals today.

In the summer of 2024, enrollmentFUEL distributed a survey to 4,106 contacts from enrollmentFUEL and NACCAP (North American Coalition for Christian Admissions Professionals) databases, achieving a 5.9% overall completion rate with 242 fully completed surveys. The survey was distributed via email and social media channels and the data was collected through multiple-choice, Likert scale, and open-ended questions. Below are a few notable results.

1: 75% have held more than one higher ed position.

Among the questions asked, the survey revealed that most enrollment management professionals are experienced and versatile, with 75% having held more than one position in higher education. This suggests a significant level of adaptability and a deep understanding of the complexities involved in enrollment management. These professionals bring a wealth of experience to their roles, often transitioning across different functions and departments within their institutions.

2: 37% feel their workload is unmanageable.

Despite their experience, many enrollment professionals face challenges related to workload. According to the survey, 37% of respondents feel their workload is unmanageable within their working hours, and a substantial 65% report performing tasks outside their primary job description multiple times a week. This finding highlights the reality of overwork in higher education, where professionals are expected to wear multiple hats, often without adequate support, training, or recognition.

3: Benefits are valued more than compensation.

While salary is a crucial factor in job satisfaction and retention, the survey identified several key benefits that enrollment management professionals find most important: vacation time/PTO, health insurance, retirement plans, professional development opportunities, and flexible or hybrid work arrangements. The emphasis on flexibility and professional development suggests that these professionals are looking for more than just financial compensation—they seek a work environment that supports their growth and well-being.

4: 52% feel professional development opportunities are crucial.

Professional development emerged as a critical factor for job retention, with 52% of respondents citing it as high-priority when considering whether to stay in their current role. This finding underscores the importance of offering growth opportunities to retain top talent in enrollment management. Institutions that offer up-to-date and accessible professional development are more likely to keep their staff engaged, motivated, and committed to their roles.

5: 64% feel they would benefit from better-organized training programs.

Training and onboarding are areas where significant improvements could be made. A striking 64% of respondents believe a more structured training program would be beneficial. This suggests many professionals feel inadequately prepared for their roles, which could contribute to job dissatisfaction and turnover. By investing in comprehensive training and onboarding programs, institutions can help new employees feel more confident and capable, ultimately enhancing job satisfaction and retention.

6: The average stress level is 7.44 out of 10.

The survey highlights a concerning level of stress among enrollment management professionals, with the average stress level reported at 7.44 on a 10-point scale. This high stress level is likely due to the combination of heavy workloads, role ambiguity, and the pressure to meet institutional goals. Addressing these stressors through better workload management, clearer job descriptions, and supportive work environments could help reduce burnout and increase job satisfaction.

7: 67% have considered leaving their position.

Perhaps the most alarming finding is that 67% of respondents have considered leaving their position in the past 10 months. This high percentage brings acuity to the retention crisis in enrollment management that appears to be driven by factors such as the ones outlined in this article. Institutions that wish to retain their enrollment management staff must address these concerns proactively with tact and structure.

The Enrollment Management Staffing Survey conducted by enrollmentFUEL provides valuable insights into the experiences of professionals working in this critical area of higher education. While many are seasoned experts who bring diverse experiences to their roles, they face significant challenges, including unmanageable workloads, high stress levels, and a lack of systemized training and professional development. Addressing these issues is fundamental for institutions seeking to retain talented staff and maintain effective enrollment strategies. By recognizing and responding to the needs of enrollment management professionals, higher education institutions can create a more supportive, satisfying, and sustainable work environment.

If you’d like to see the full review of the survey results to further strategize improving your institution’s staffing retention and satisfaction, download the PDF here.

Higher Ed Email Marketing: How Much is Too Much?

Higher Ed Email Marketing | enrollmentFUEL | SEM Articles

Higher Ed Email Marketing: How Much is Too Much?

I recently overheard the following during an industry conference roundtable session on yield strategies: “We make sure to really over-communicate with students and their families to get our messages to them. So, we send them all the emails. All the time. Constant outreach. Until, you know, they respond.”

This has been a long-standing school of thought within admissions professionals: a student who has not responded to a single email today can still be tomorrow’s enrolled student, if only we keep sending them emails until one resonates with them. 

That way of thinking, however, can be challenging and even detrimental to your recruitment efforts. Let’s dive into some reasons why you should be even more careful with this strategy this recruitment cycle and onward.

Keeping a Close Eye on KPIs

Email-dominant communication flows are experiencing a drastic downturn in efficacy. We know email continues to be an essential part of recruitment efforts, and that it is not going anywhere for now. Yet, as you continue to use bulk email communications in the aftermath of the spam and deliverability changes email giants Gmail and Yahoo! introduced over the past two years, it’s imperative that you monitor your overall spam rate daily. Especially when non-responder messaging is a major part of your strategy. 

When you email recipients who consistently do not interact with your content, you increase the risk that they will mark the messages as spam. As they do so, mail platforms calculate an overall spam rate for all of your communications, and if that spam rate score maintains 0.3% or higher (that’s three students in 1,000 marking your email as spam), then your email deliverability will be affected.

The spam rate could additionally impact your domain reputation. If your overall domain reputation drops to “Low” or even “Bad,” all content coming out of that domain will be redirected straight into spam folders for all recipients. 

In other words, continuously peppering non-responders on top of the funnel with emails could hurt your ability to reach out to students much deeper in the funnel who do want to hear from you, but their inbox has rejected your messages.

How do you remedy that? Focus your consistent email communications lower in the funnel when the messages are meaningful to their recipients. A student who has gone through the application process with you is far more likely to be interested in what you are telling them than a student who has received 25 emails from you already but has not responded to a single one. 

Students Want Fewer Emails. Period.

Year over year, students want to receive less and less weekly emails. This year, only 39% of Class of 2025 said weekly outreach is acceptable, down from 81% just three years ago. Not only that, but many students openly share on platforms like Reddit how overwhelmed they feel by receiving too many emails.. 

Our team stays up to date on conversations in the “Applying To College” subreddit, and we would strongly recommend you do as well. For instance, a series of related threads discussing the high number of college emails received by specific individuals shows a drastic jump in email volume over the past few years.

While one student six years ago shared “a brief analysis of 2,374 college emails” they had received, and another posted an analysis of 3,069 emails sent to them by colleges two years later, the most recent addition to the series boasts data from one Class of 2024 user who received over 13,300 college emails.

The stats and commentary gathered by these entrepreneurial, college-bound students and their commenters are genuinely illuminating:

  • On average, the three posters received between 17 and 24 emails per college before the point of application. 
  • Some colleges (no naming names here!) went as far as sending nearly 340 emails to a single recipient. 
  • Frequently-used subject lines all announced fee-waivers, deadline extensions, and priority or custom applications. None of them seemed popular with the readers. 
  • “Is this you, [Student Name]?” and similar subject lines did not go well with that crowd either, and neither did anything marked as “Urgent!”, “Priority”, or “You’ve been selected”
  • Shoutouts to “weirdest subject lines” went too out-of-the box with clickbait style subject lines. Examples included “GIANT ANTS! AAAHH!!!!” or “Find your baby crocodile, [Student Name]”. Others deserving (dis)honorable mentions were ones the students deemed sounding like “a creepy pickup line” (“You’ve got our attention, [Student Name]” or “Weekend plans?”).

Please note, none of these students, or anyone involved in the threads, said they did not want to receive any emails. But if one thing stood out, it was that the colleges with the highest number of email counts seemed to achieve the opposite effect: decreased interaction with their intended audience. A few commenters even pointed out that they no longer considered a college because of the overwhelming number of communications that soured their experience.

Election Woes Are Not Just for Digital Marketing

Election years pose additional unique challenges to marketing efforts. The U.S. election season has a substantial effect on marketing across all industries. While past election cycles have traditionally had a negative impact due to increase in noise on all channels, a close election may bring the volume up to record levels (experts predicted upwards of $16 billion spent on communication efforts from both parties in 2024). In turn, this will lead to content exhaustion and recipients tuning out any messages they are exposed to. 

By mid-September, the cost of paid social media advertising and search campaigns across industries may rise anywhere from 15 to 50%, while performance will go down about 2 to 3% per week in the final six weeks before the election. Email marketing will not be spared, either: email newsletter CTRs in the past have dropped as much as 25% in the month before a general election. 

In other words, do not expect this fall’s communication efforts on any channels to yield wildly successful results, regardless of your investment in them. If anything, a return to personalized outreach such as phone calls and texts, as well as meeting students and families on the road, might be the most effective way to build a relationship with them.

Over-Emailed & Overwhelmed

There is hardly an organization that does not communicate with us via email: from work and schools, to doctor’s offices, businesses, our preferred social media sites, the post office, or that one influencer you interacted with that one time who now cheerfully sends you their weekly newsletter. (Or is that just me?) Bottom line, we are already bombarded by email notifications before we even look at marketing emails. There are 361.6 billion emails sent worldwide every single day. And while 88% of people check their emails daily, 38.5% of them engage with the emails they receive for less than eight seconds—during that brief time they determine whether they will delete, ignore, respond to, or mark the interaction as spam. If the recipient is a top-of-the-funnel student, their action in these eight seconds could affect your overall communication flow for the entire cycle.

Where to Go From Here

While we are not telling you to break up with email for good, we would definitely recommend you ponder a few tips as you go into the next cycle. 

  • Don’t put all of your messaging eggs into the email basket, especially with prospect communications. Diversify your channels as much as possible by adding digital ads (display and social media or Google Pay-Per-Click ads, which have proven themselves in recent years) and be sure you’re creating quality, organic content on your social media channels and website.  
  • Be like Elsa, and let them go: Monitor your email communications and promptly remove ANY non-responders or recipients who have marked your messages as spam. Ensure you have a weekly check-in with whoever is monitoring your domain reputation and overall spam rates. 
  • Stay relevant in your messages to students and families. Do your research and create/update your communication flows to reflect recent trends. Audit your communication flows on an annual basis to ensure you have the right mix of channels and content. If you are not sure where to start on that, we have a course that can help

The key to avoiding the pitfalls of email exhaustion is intentionality. 

As I think back on the example in the beginning, to the college determined to send  “all the emails, all the time, constant outreach,” it is clear that this strategy was born not out of prior successes, but from lack of resources and bandwidth. However, as we saw above, there is a point of saturation and diminishing return, and you should consider that carefully while building your communications. 

Find a way to utilize email as a part of an overall strategy, not make it the entire strategy. Otherwise, this popular and common tool may turn out to be more costly than useful.

Milena Velez has over 16 years of enrollment management experience with diverse student populations. A former international student, she started her career in 2007 as Coordinator of International Recruitment and has held various roles, including Director of Admission at Newberry College. She specializes in creating enrollment communication strategies and improving institutional processes.

Milena earned her bachelor’s from Oberlin College, an MBA from Lake Erie College, and a Master of Arts in Rhetoric and Writing from the University of Findlay. Originally from Bulgaria, she now lives in South Carolina with her husband, Joel, their daughter, Stella, and their dog, Luna. In her free time, she enjoys writing, running, and relaxing with a good book and a cup of tea.